Lunedì è andata in archivio la sessione invernale del calciomercato con le ormai consuete clamorose operazioni concluse sul filo wool.
The most striking bear the signature of Roman Abramovich and his Chelsea players returned after a couple of years on the run, with the engagements taken by Liverpool's Fernando Torres and, to my greatest disappointment, David Luiz, for a total € 83 million.
The same Liverpool, economic disaster, has reinvested the millions earned by the sale of Torres, but not limited to spending about seventy Carroll and Luis Suarez.
In Italy, only give a look at the three major historical, Moratti has shelled out more than 25 million promised to make the market (and maintained) and then given to Benitez Leonardo fired after the Spaniard.
Juventus with Quagliarella has replaced the injured Toni (risky choice from all points of view) and then gutted the last second useful with the fifth or sixth choice (Matri, having chased Dzeko, Gila, Pazzini, Huntelaar who knows who else) once occurred on their skin tones to gamble.
With all loans to be redeemed in July, Juve has already breached the budget for the summer market.
Milan losing the pieces in midfield recruits Dutch Emanuelson and Van Bommel in the wake of the emergency, bringing to ten the number of items available in the department of Allegri median total and thirty-one members of the rose.
Some teams come revolutionized the winter market and are unrecognizable since the beginning of the season. The workforce of people who are still involved in Europe are not fully exploited due to UEFA regulations which, unlike what happens in the national leagues will not allow a player to play in the same competition with two different mesh.
Financial fair play built by Platini seems more and more a bland statement of intent rather than a program being implemented, and European clubs continue to behave just financially virtuous. The pay TV
lord it by requiring national and international federations and leagues to their rules, forcing whole movement in frenzied rhythms and unsustainable at all levels, technical, financial, athletic and human.
The unstoppable bandwagon is racing towards the abyss, you may be slow, but a stop and reverse seem to be pure utopia.
So, idealistically, I make some proposals without pretending to give a solution to all problems and even less hope or illusion that they are taken into account by those who have in hand the destiny of this ... business, which I would still call it sport.
Proposal No. 1: " reduction of all the member associations of the Uefa Cup to a maximum of sixteen teams .
will also be trivial, but I think that "less games and more training" is a recipe that may help to reduce the huge amount of more or less serious injuries that plague each year, great players and actors, a decision that would significantly improve even the show.
Players generally more relaxed, fitter and well-trained would offer better performance and more likely to preserve tendons, muscles and joints from injuries of varying natura.
Proposta numero 2 : " abolizione del mercato invernale e tetto massimo di 25 giocatori tesserabili per ogni società ".
Il tetto al numero di giocatori tesserabili è già una norma in vigore nel campionato spagnolo, mentre nelle competizioni europee è il limite di giocatori iscrivibili con, in più, l'aggiunta dell'obbligo di inserire nei 25 un numero crescente anno dopo anno di elementi provenienti dai vivai.
Questa proposta è strettamente legata alla precedente, e i vantaggi, a mio parere, sono evidenti e di varia natura.
Per quanto concerne l'aspetto puramente sports, this rule would preserve the identity of a team for an entire season by stimulating a certain programming from the management of the club.
From a financial standpoint, the reduction in operating costs compared to a normal pink to a too large it is also evident, as is the reduction in expenses resulting from the abolition of the session of the winter market.
addition, the cap on the number of card-carrying "force" companies to really enhance the nursery with a further economic advantage, rather than resorting to ridiculous "Italian solution" as the reduction of non-card holders who do not give any impetus to sectors youth and reduce the competitiveness of the Italian team against the rest of Europe.
If, for example, Quagliarella gets injured the same despite the reduction in the number of lots and increased hours of training, Juventus, rather than buying and Toni Matri and pay salary to Quagliarella, Toni and Matri , would be forced to resort to the elements of spring by giving them opportunities that are outdated today.
In this way, the discriminant that separates the "great" from "small" (not just in Italy but throughout Europe) is no longer the only economic power (often only virtual), but a serious project on young people who would become a important resource per i club anche dal punto di vista tecnico. Inoltre, come effetto collaterale, la reale valorizzazione dei settori giovanili porterebbe anche ad una riduzione del monte ingaggi e delle odierne astronomiche valutazioni dei giocatori.
Pubblicato sul sito di Milan Day
0 comments:
Post a Comment